Leicester 2-0 Chelsea: Rodgers successfully rotated formations to victory

Leicester City stadium (Photo by Alex Pantling/Getty Images)
Leicester City stadium (Photo by Alex Pantling/Getty Images)
1 of 3
Leicester City
Leicester City stadium (Photo by Alex Pantling/Getty Images)

Leicester City added another “top six” club carcass to the collection, as Brendan Rodgers overcame his dismal head-to-head record with Chelsea, to see the Foxes go top of the Premier League table – even if it’ll only be for a few hours.

Frank Lampard’s Chelsea have been seriously struggling, the loss at the King Power Stadium ensured that The Pensioners have only won a single game in their last five. Regardless, the quality of personnel in their squad – and the monetary investment – meant that the fixture was always going to be difficult for Brendan Rodgers and Leicester City.

Both teams operated in 4-3-3 formations, which is the ordinary system Lampard has defaulted to during his time at Stamford Bridge, whilst Rodgers made a slight shift from the 4-2-3-1 formations he’s been predominantly using. The key differences being the positioning of the midfield, in the 4-2-3-1 formation, James Maddison plays as a #10 – directly behind the lone striker of Jamie Vardy. Youri Tielemans and Wilfred Ndidi partner to make a double pivot at the base of midfield – referred to as No.6.

In the 4-3-3 formation, Rodgers advanced Tielemans’ natural positioning, playing him as a box-to-box (#8), and did the same with Maddison – dropping him from his attacking-midfield position. Wilfred Ndidi was tasked with playing as the sole defensive-midfielder, a role he thrives in. I believe Rodgers’ composition in the midfield was aided by the exclusion of N’golo Kante – who had a hamstring injury. With Kante operating as the #6 for Chelsea, instead of Mateo Kovačić, the balance of the two midfields would’ve been a lot more even – without the Frenchman, Leicester City controlled that sector of the pitch.

This adjustment, switching from the 4-2-3-1 formation to the 4-3-3 formation, is another clear example of Rodgers identifying the oppositions strengths, and also their weaknesses, and having the tactical flexibility to implement different systems to great effect. This is a testament to the quality of coaching, that not only are they able to adapt to different scenarios, but the elevated performance level of each individual has been exemplary.

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations