Two big-names off the list
From that list, two names are now off the table. Potter and Moyes are no longer being considered for the top job. Considering how these would have been the two safe bets for Leicester City, it is strange to see both removed. I would contend that there are three factors which impacted the choice of the club on this matter.
First of all, it is key to note that the Foxes have not made significant progress under Cooper. The Welshman did not develop key players beyond Abdul Fatawu or create a cohesive system to get the most out of the players. In this context, why would two big-name head coaches take the plunge and risk their career’s at an unstable club? They should not be expected to.
Secondly, from a playstyle perspective, I do not think either fitted what Leicester wanted to develop in the aftermath of Enzo Maresca. The King Power side want a possession-based system which also prizes swift ball progression and sleek shorter passing. David Moyes is the exact opposite, with his West Ham side having been characterised by low possession, long-balls and quick progression, as well as quick turnovers of play both for and against. More chaotic, but with the right shape it can be potent.
Meanwhile, Potter does not employ a particularly imaginative system. This is not problematic, but when dogmatic and relied upon, a system which does not fit the team or counter the opposition is not helpful in the long run. That system also requires exceptional transfer business to maintain the energy levels and motivation to keep it up. That is a trait LCFC does not portray.
Finally, we have to respect that other candidates may offer a more adaptable system, and - crucially - cost less for Leicester City to acquire. After spending the money to sack Cooper, and with plans in the transfer window, a non-expensive head coach would be preferred.