Skip to main content

Claim made that Leicester bosses lied about relegation clauses

A concerning claim has emerged which alleges that City bosses lied about the apparent relegation contract clauses.
Leicester City v Millwall - Sky Bet Championship - King Power Stadium
Leicester City v Millwall - Sky Bet Championship - King Power Stadium | David Davies - PA Images/GettyImages

Few Foxes fans, independent pundits, aligned experts or journalists completely trust Leicester City Football Club or their announcements anymore, surely. Some truly questionable practices and details have emerged over the previous three or four years.

The idiom (which sounds conveniently similar to 'idiot') "The blind leading the blind" comes to mind. The LE2 organisation's financial position and methods are arguably the most scrutinised areas of the modern LCFC, concerningly.

Even when compared to the nightmarish situation on the pitch, money (particularly its alleged mishandling) remains the prime hot topic on Filbert Way. Albeit City chief executive Kevin Davies recently stated that the Leicestershire outfit adhered to Profit and Sustainability parameters during the 2025/26 campaign.

Davies had better be being honest. Otherwise a justifiable revolt will surely occur at King Power Stadium again.

Leicester City liars?!

However, Davies and the club at large are presently being challenged by apparently esteemed monetary specialist Kieran Maguire.​ One specific element he challenged was Leicester's controversial claim that they inserted 'double relegation clauses' into players' contracts: placed in order to reduce overheads and salaries.

"The club is putting out that there were double relegation clauses if they got relegated to League One,” he added. “I have spoken to a few agents, not of players at the club, but it is a new one of them."
Football Lowdown

If Maguire's assessment is correct and chairman Aiyawatt Srivaddhanaprabha (commonly known as "Top") alongside chief football officer Jon Rudkin (commonly considered incompetent) have effectively obfuscated the truth, they will surely find themselves without a leg to stand on. The ramifications of such a deception would be catastrophic for the club's credibility, especially considering the current precarious financial landscape.

Should this narrative of fiscal transparency be revealed as a convenient fiction, the board will undoubtedly face an unprecedented and valid wave of supporter hostility and institutional scrutiny; not to mention jeopardy. Just look at Southampton and Sheffield Wednesday.

Integrity is a fragile commodity in football, and once squandered, it is rarely recovered. City's leadership must now navigate these accusations with absolute precision to avoid a definitive collapse of public trust.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations